Tag: National Rifle Association

How Much The NRA Cares About Elephants.

I just learned from a number of sources that the National Rifle Association (NRA) is opposing President Obama’s plan to restrict American hunters from bringing home more than two elephant “trophies” a year,

To see the Note click here.To hide the Note click here.
References:

  • “What does the Republican Party have against elephants?”A2 That’s a good question. In the last line of the article, the author Andrew Wetzler mentions that the elephant is the mascot of the Republican Party.  He may have stumbled onto a motive.  Could the Republicans possibly be thinking that if all the wild elephants were gone, then the law of supply and demand would make their mascot more valuable?
  • “The NRA Is Quietly Fighting For Your Right To Kill Elephants For Their Ivory”A3


ostensibly because that would make it harder for gun owners to get top dollar when they try to sell guns with ivory handlesA. Does that even make sense? It is interesting to see their priorities.

Here are my Comments to the NRA:

  • Since we all know that “guns don’t kill elephants, people do”,
To see the Note click here.To hide the Note click here.
I am expanding on the unofficial slogan of the NRAA here. People with rocks, no doubt, kill elephants.  Possibly even people with tomatoes.  That could explain all of those pink elephants you’ve been seeing lately.


and

  • since the NRA’s job is clearly only to push rifles, as their name implies, then
  • I don’t see how you have any standing in this matter (in English, that means “Why should anybody care what you think about elephants”).


    • The NRA needs to step away from this important issue on the fate of elephants and let the people speak for themselves.

    Pondering Gun Control

    Since we all know that

    • “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun”A, and since
    • mass shootings have been going up over the last three decadesA.
    To see the Note click here.To hide the Note click here.
    You might want to check out this slideshow of a USA Today investigation at “BEHIND THE BLOODSHED; THE UNTOLD STORY OF AMERICA’S MASS KILLINGS”.


    and since

  • Americans (per capita) already own about 45% the civilian-held firearms in the worldA1)


    • we must conclude that there just aren’t that many good guys out there with guns, and there is no way to get enough good guys with guns!

    To see the Note click here.To hide the Note click here.
    Would the more-than-100-year-old saying  that “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutelyA be a factor in this issue?


    If that IS the case, then it follows that taking some guns away would hurt the bad guys much more than it would hurt the good guys. Maybe it is time to start taking away some guns. Australia did it, and it worked well (see Article).

    But first, let’s take one more look at the Second Amendment. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” It would have been nice if they could have spoken plain English back then. But the way I read it this means that it is the state’s responsibility and duty to control gun ownership for the purpose of establishing a militia. The federal government would have to step away (except to meet other requirements like the interstate commerce clause), and the individual would have to be content with whatever gun privileges s/he is left with. There is a nice discussion of the second amendment at Cornell University’s Legal Information Institute.

    I’ve never understood the implicit argument of the National Rifle Association (NRA) that if we try to take guns away from confirmed bad guys and crazy people, then we have to take them from everybody. Really!! If you are going to stick to that requirement, then in order to save people’s lives I may have no choice but to accept your conditions and vote to take all guns. But that would be sad to think that every conscientious gun owner had to suffer because you couldn’t differentiate between the confirmed bad guys and everybody else. This inability of yours also begs the question “If you can’t tell the good guys from the bad guys, then who the f&@# are you shooting at.” In my mind you are also too dangerous to carry a gun.

    I may be willing to negotiate on this. But if you are going to sway me you are going to have to give up the one-liners that you and the NRA stole from Comedy Central. Present some real arguments supported by real facts, not fear.

    To see the Note click here.To hide the Note click here.

    Interestingly enough, the NRA has a history of suppressing the facts on this topicA. History and my own experience tell me that the people fighting the growth and spread of knowledge do NOT have your best interests at heart.

    5/31/2026 Update: The ban on gun violence research has been liftedDetails.


    I’m ready to publish your arguments.