The Problem With Pendulums

Don’t get me wrong! There is a place for pendulums, but only because their imperfections are so predictable.

To see the Note click here.To hide the Note click here.
Wikipedia has an articleD that gives more information about pendulums than most readers would like, including the math, history, and problems perfecting them. For a shorter version focussing mostly on the math, see The Department of Physics & Astronomy website at Georgia State University.
  Pendulums try very hard to be in the right place at the right time, but they are dismal failures. The only time they rest or stop moving for even a moment is when they are as far from perfect as they can possibly get. They spend less time at their desired destination than they spend anywhere else on their route, and during that nanosecond of success, they are moving their fastest toward another extreme position. Why is that?

Pendulums cannot think.  Pendulums cannot predict, they cannot anticipate.   They cannot see the consequences of their own actions.  They can’t even tell that they’ve been to their desired destination until they see it in the rear view mirror.  You might say that they have a very slim grip on reality.  They only react.  And as a result, they are doomed to a life of constant searching, continually bouncing frantically from one radical position to another.   Welcome to the real world.  People who practice similar policies WILL suffer similar fates.  And welcome to politics.

Any questions?

Published by

Silent

An old fictitious liberal of unknown race, gender, size, and sexual orientation that believes in both God and science and is not the least bit intimidated by numbers. Based on that description, you shouldn't rule out the possibility that we could be a composite character.

5 thoughts on “The Problem With Pendulums”

        1. Thank you very much. I still owe you an article regarding team play vs. rugged individualism – it is nowhere near ready, but I just wanted you to know I haven’t forgotten.

          For the casual reader, some explanation may be in order. Ms. Rodriguez has her own web presence (a writer’s blog) which I follow and Enjoy (and probably make comments more often than appropriate). But don’t expect more of what you see here – in fact closer to polar opposites; she writes short, even pithy, powerful poetry on matters closer to the heart – areas I fear to cover in which I feel I have little to contribute. Her blog would surely satisfy your goal, as expressed in How We Lose Our Grip On Reality, of diversifying your information sources.

          Also don’t think that a flattering comment here will automatically get you a rousing endorsement of your own website. But then again, you need not take my word for it.

Comments?